Re: Ti-86 Bug?

Re: Ti-86 Bug?

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Ti-86 Bug?
• From: Philipp Keller <pkiller@ANTISOCIAL.COM>
• Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 11:42:22 -0500
• Organization: Bell Solutions
• References: <1bXf2.232$y_.662@news20.bellglobal.com> <19981222201617.00124.00000357@ng38.aol.com> <fQZf2.465$y_.955@news20.bellglobal.com> <75utoq$kkr$1@news.cybercity.dk>
• Reply-To: Philipp Keller <sandia@rocler.qc.ca>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27105

How does a HP48 get around the problem?

Steen Schmidt <SSchmidt@vip.cybercity.dk> wrote in message
>Forget this silly round-off error and get a HP48.

• Re: Ti-86 Bug?
• From: Steve <redled@PEAKACCESS.NET>

• Re: Ti-86 Bug?
• From: Philipp Keller <pkiller@ANTISOCIAL.COM>
• Re: Ti-86 Bug?
• From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>
• Re: Ti-86 Bug?
• From: Philipp Keller <pkiller@ANTISOCIAL.COM>
• Re: Ti-86 Bug?
• From: Steen Schmidt <SSchmidt@VIP.CYBERCITY.DK>

• Prev: Re: TI-89 and AP Test
• Next: Re: TI-89 and AP Test
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread