Re: Underestimated stats

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Underestimated stats
From: Dick Smith <dick@RISCTEX.DEMON.CO.UK>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 07:43:28 GMT
Organization: Occasionally!
References: <797nu5$9vl$1@brokaw.wa.com> <36B77D4D.5DDB65EF@echip.com>
Reply-To: Dick Smith <dick@RISCTEX.DEMON.CO.UK>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27854

In article <36B77D4D.5DDB65EF@echip.com>,
          bwheeler@echip.com (Bob Wheeler) wrote:

] Hint: if the units are inches, so that the data is
] 6 in, 7 in, etc. What are the units of 1.66 ?

How is this a hint to the solution of the original poster's problem? :-)
The units (which will be the same for the SD as the original data units,
whatever they are) will not affect the /value/ of the SD, which was the
subject of the original query.

Dick

--
=============================================================================
Dick Smith                                           dick@risctex.demon.co.uk
Acorn Risc PC                                  http://www.risctex.demon.co.uk
=============================================================================

References:

Underestimated stats

From: John C <jcole@HALCYON.COM>

Re: Underestimated stats

From: Bob Wheeler <bwheeler@ECHIP.COM>

Prev: Re: (/`7._.7'/`7._.7'ROM DUMP`7._.7'/`7._.7'/)
Next: Re: TI-89: How to convert decimal sto fractions and vice versa
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread