Re: Differences between 92 and 89?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Differences between 92 and 89?



On Tue, 8 Sep 1998 20:47:15 -0500, "Mathew Ryden" <dryden19-2@idt.net>
wrote:

>>>8. Anything else I should be concerned with or aware of about getting a 89
>>>or 92?
>>I think you've about covered it.  Realise that the 89 is a much better deal
>>than the 92 or 92+, unless you really really need geometry or a qwerty
>>keyboard.
>The 89 right now isn't really finished.  They have some bugs in the OS, and
>assembly doesn't work right now.
>

Eh? What are some of the bugs you've noticed? And being that TI hasn't
released any asm information yet, how have you been able to do
anything asm-related yet? (Ehh, it's late. What I mean is, how've you
determined that the assembly doesn't work yet?)

Rolf


References: