Re: TI-89

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-89

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-89
From: Michael Astrauskas <julian63@geocities.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 04:03:28 GMT
Organization: @Home Network
References: <v01540b02b211b91529cc@[206.40.98.57]> <35F1C4F6.540D@turkey.com>
Reply-To: julian63@geocities.com
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:24455

Jed Davis wrote:

>
>
>
> Anyway, the TI-92 non-plus is still forbidden, even though the 89 does a
> lot more. This is strange.

Isn't a 89 just a 92 in a vertical case, lower res and sans Geometry?

--
 - Michael Astrauskas  ICQ UIN: 1946065, Trevelyan
   My humble Anime-type art site:
   www.geocities.com/timessquare/6300

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-89

From: Tucker <tucker1@ameritech.net>

References:

Re: TI-89

From: GARY WARDALL <gwardall@LAKEFIELD.NET>

Re: TI-89

From: Jed Davis <davises@TURKEY.COM>

Prev: Re: Linking 83->86 and etc.?
Next: Re: I am not kidding about the certificate forgery
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread