Well, unless I'm mistaken, the number says 92, not 89. Which means that it shouldn't run on the 89 unless changes are made!!!!! Think b4 u leap! Glen Solsberry In a message dated 10/30/98 3:13:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, rahusain@EROLS.KOM writes: > Well, I can finally confirm it was not a fluke: > It happened to another TI-89 user today. Luckily he ripped out the > batteries in time. Beware of Mario92.