Re: IR better than Links?

Re: IR better than Links?

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: IR better than Links?
• From: Adam Davis <adavis@BALADYNE.COM>
• Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:53:14 -0500
• Organization: Ameritech.Net www.ameritech.net Complaints: abuse@ameritech.net
• References: <3636C2D0.8862F182@mindless.com>
• Reply-To: Adam Davis <adavis@BALADYNE.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26067

The IR link is slower.  The processor on the HP is slower.  The computer
to calc link for ti is probably slower than the IR because of the limit
TI put on their graphlink cable.

-Adam

DaMaStErMiNd wrote:
>
> After looking at some of the HP programs I see that TI calcs have a big
> disadvantage when it comes to communicating with other devices.  It was
> amazing what programs there were for HPs using IR such as the remote
> control program.  It also eliminates the need for buying an expensive
> TI-Graph link.  Is TI sticking to the passe linking system?
> (Is IR faster?)

• IR better than Links?
• From: DaMaStErMiNd <damastermind@MINDLESS.COM>

• Prev: Re: Emulator for TI82???
• Next: Re: Ti-89 Died
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread