Re: question about the 86 and the 89

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: question about the 86 and the 89
From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 05:09:26 GMT
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: <3.0.32.19981012091235.00860e90@tcsn.net>
Reply-To: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:25583

I can testify from personal experience that a TI-89 is not needed on the SAT. I
got a perfect 1600 on the SAT with a TI-85 that had 1K of free memory. (I was
working on several prime number projects at the time and was too lazy to wipe
my memory.)
------
STL137@aol.com  ===>  Website: http://members.aol.com/stl137/
PGP keys: ~~~pgp.html Quotes: ~~~quotes.html
"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of
tyranny over the mind of man" - Thomas Jefferson

References:

Re: question about the 86 and the 89

From: Nic Werner <buzz@TCSN.NET>

Prev: Re: RF data modules, Abacom technologies...
Next: Re: question about the 86 and the 89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread