Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?
From: "Andy L." <TrekerL@HOTMAIL.COM>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 18:14:21 GMT
Organization: UMass Lowell
References: <361144F4.5D26E314@infini.fr> <6v7la9$46qe$1@news-inn.inet.tele.dk> <3617BF20.51B5@earthlink.net>
Reply-To: "Andy L." <TrekerL@HOTMAIL.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:25572

On Sun, 04 Oct 1998 11:32:00 -0700, Libby Krueger
<krueger@earthlink.net> wrote:

>Fellow TI-ers:
>
>   Writing software to do symbolic processing on a platform like the
>TI-85 would be tough!  Why?  Because symbolic algebra systems require
>exetensive symbol manipulation capabilities - and that implies use of
>a language such as Lisp, C/C++, Pascal...  The BASIC built into TI

why not use small-C to wright it then.

-Andy

Follow-Ups:

Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?

From: Kasper Vibe Grevsen <removekaspervg@POST6.TELE.DK>

References:

From:

Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?

From: Kasper Vibe Grevsen <removekaspervg@POST6.TELE.DK>

Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?

From: Libby Krueger <krueger@earthlink.net>

Prev: Re: Battery low? not....
Next: Re: question about the 86 and the 89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread