Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?

Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: Tom Lake <tomlake@SLIC.COM>
• Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 20:47:37 -0400
• Organization: St. Lawrence Internet Connection
• References: <3.0.5.32.19981006124441.008019d0@mail.online.no> <361a7a82.1128025@news.northcoast.com> <361A8F09.2E08BA28@ameritech.net> <361aabc4.1741582@news.northcoast.com> <361BF1E2.AAB0B3EE@ameritech.net>
• Reply-To: Tom Lake <tomlake@SLIC.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:25478

Tucker wrote in message <361BF1E2.AAB0B3EE@ameritech.net>...
>I was comparing to other TI's, like the 86. Sure you can go to catalog,
>but that requires you scroll through hundreds of functions. With the
>TI-86, more are present on the keypad. I REALLY think there should be
>more functions available through the diamond key on the 92.


You don't have to scroll through hundreds of functions, just a dozen at
most.  If you type the first letter of the command you want, you'll go right
to the first command that starts with that letter.  Example to get tan( :
Press CATALOG, T (no need for Alpha)and you'll almost be there.

Tom Lake

• Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: Tucker <tucker1@ameritech.net>

• Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E5kon?= Hansen <haakonha@ONLINE.NO>
• Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: Tom <tomgNOSPAM.@NORTHCOAST.COM>
• Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: Tucker <tucker1@ameritech.net>
• Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: Tom <tomgNOSPAM.@NORTHCOAST.COM>
• Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
• From: Tucker <tucker1@ameritech.net>

• Prev: PRIME6 Erratum
• Next: Re: FS: TI-92, Excellent Condition
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread