Re: A better calculator, for what?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: A better calculator, for what?
From: Bill Risher <billr1@MIDSOUTH.NET>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 21:12:08 -0500
Comments: To: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>
In-Reply-To: <3612AD22.69081219@nospam.visi.com>
References: <361071A3.7D8832B3@mindless.com> <36111741.482DD680@math.unc.edu>
Reply-To: Bill Risher <billr1@MIDSOUTH.NET>

Nice summary, found one mistake, big one too...


At 05:13 PM 09/30/98 -0500, ToddEStan wrote:
>suspect a calculator that looks like 83 :)  The 89 is banned from the
>SAT, but allowed on the ACT BTW.  The 83/86 are accepted on both.  The
Backwards.  Allowed on SAT but not on ACT.

--
Bill Risher        Sparr      UIN:1952775    ._, . . .
Lorenai #44        Makra      FON:9316484164 |_) o | |
Overlord n7hq      Decius                    |_) | | |
mailto://billr1@midsouth.net  FAX:9315526807 ^ ` ^ ^ ^

References:

From:

From:

Re: A better calculator, for what?

From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>

Prev: Re: A better calculator, for what?
Next: Re: special characters
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread