Re: Ti-89 Died

Re: Ti-89 Died

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Ti-89 Died
• From: Tom <tomgNOSPAM@NORTHCOAST.COM>
• Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 06:13:02 GMT
• Organization: http://www.supernews.com, The World's Usenet: Discussions Start Here
• References: <363E33FB.D5404F99@nospam.visi.com> <19981102181543.23081.00002748@ng35.aol.com>
• Reply-To: Tom <tomgNOSPAM@NORTHCOAST.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26211

On 2 Nov 1998 23:15:43 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:

><<Technically, you can write to a ROM, but only once.  Then it cannot be
>overwritten or erased.  That is why a rom virus isn't a problem in any
>calcs but the 73, 89, and 92+.  >>
>Yeah, but only when you burn it in at the photolithography plant.

Lil fella, while I an suitably impressed with your use of a big word,
you are confusing chip making with rom burning.  Let me know when you
get a clue.

• Re: Ti-89 Died
• From: SmithwickC <smithwickc@AOL.COM>

• Re: Ti-89 Died
• From: ToddEStan <toddestn@NOSPAM.VISI.COM>
• Re: Ti-89 Died
• From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

• Prev: Re: ti-82 (yes, *82*) question...
• Next: Re: Ti-89 Died
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread