Re: TI 85,86, HP or Casio?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI 85,86, HP or Casio?
From: Matt Weintraub <neda@EROLS.COM>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 17:36:28 -0500
References: <71e3t3$69f@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <19981031132326.14643.00001924@ng11.aol.com>
Reply-To: Matt Weintraub <neda@EROLS.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26144

Why is that?

--

Matt Weintraub
neda@erols.com
http://www.erols.com/neda
"Your mouse cursor has moved.
NT must be restarted for this change
to take effect."


STL137 wrote in message <19981031132326.14643.00001924@ng11.aol.com>...
>But don't forget that 86s are SLOOOOOW, and if you need heavy-duty number
>crunching, the 85 is better. (For example, primality testing of large
numbers.)
>------
>STL137@aol.com  ===>  Website: http://members.aol.com/stl137/
>PGP keys: ~~~pgp.html Quotes: ~~~quotes.html
>"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of
>tyranny over the mind of man" - Thomas Jefferson
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI 85,86, HP or Casio?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Re: TI 85,86, HP or Casio?

From: Kasper Vibe Grevsen <removekaspervg@POST6.TELE.DK>

References:

From:

Re: TI 85,86, HP or Casio?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>