Re: Why not the TI-92?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why not the TI-92?
From: "Dr. SPUI" <dem@MORASESKI.IMA-NETREMOVE.COM>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 20:33:07 -0400
Organization: PSINet
References: <356ba6cb.21535048@cdn-news.telecom.com.au> <6ki2hv$rj$1@client3.news.psi.net> <bizmar-2805980353300001@ip39.sou.mind.net>
Reply-To: "Dr. SPUI" <dem@MORASESKI.IMA-NETREMOVE.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:23115

Sorry, I forgot about normal stat stuff. I was talking about the inferential
stats.
biz wrote in message ...
>
>>The TI-83 has this built in, and you can get stat stuff on the 86 off the
>>internet at www.ti.com but you need a link cable. The 92 doesn't have any
>>stat stuff.
>
>
>
>What you said about the TI-92 is ridiculous.
>
>Have you ever used a TI-92?
>
>
>I'm MAJORING in statistics, and it has everything you can need for that.
>The stuff that it doesn't have built in, programs can be made for easily.
>Also, the TI-92 expansion module is coming out summertime, and that will
>have expanded math features as well.
>
>
>Cheers, Justin Z.
>
>--
>Change bizmar@martini.office.cdsnet.net to
>bizmark@martini.office.cdsnet.net
>to reply by email.

References:

Why not the TI-92?

From: Midnight Wells <autumn_storms@HOTMAIL.COM>

From:

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: biz <bizmar@MARTINI.OFFICE.CDSNET.NET>

Prev: inequaliity
Next: Re: inequaliity
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread