Re: 85 or 86

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: 85 or 86
From: The Pletchers <bpspcp-travelin@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 20:32:10 -0400
Reply-To: The Pletchers <bpspcp-travelin@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>

Integrated ASM support helps me a lot. You dont have to have a shell just to
run them.

Plus it's backwards-compatible with the 85.

At 07:47 PM 5/4/98 -0400, Bryan Rabeler wrote:
>steve wrote:
>
>> What are the major differences between the ti-85 and ti-86 besides the
>> addition of the table function?
>
>The 86 has a much nicer screen and about 3.5 times as much memory as the
>85.
>
>--
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>   File Archives
>   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
__________________________

What is there to say about silence?
__________________________
Welcome to the U.S.S. Crew
-- http://www.jeffb.home.ml.org/
-- http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/1149/
================================================
ICQ UIN (if you have ICQ)        -- 2097846
ICQ E-mail Express (if you dont) -- mailto:2097846@wwp.mirabilis.com
__________________________

Prev: Re: 85 or 86
Next: Hello
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread