Re: TI-89?

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-89?

It's NOT backwards compatible -- it's a scaled down handheld version of the
92
And no, this is actually a good idea (It'll be SAT-allowed), but the 73
sounds dumb. . .

Welverin Do'Urden wrote in message
<3548b087.1565537776@news.primenet.com>...
>I've heard a lot about the TI-89, yet no specifics.  My main question
>is this:  Is it of the 81/82/83 line, or the 85/86 line?
>
>Which calculators is it backwards compatible with?
>
>And does anyone else agree with me that TI should just settle down on
>one line and stick with developing it?
>
>Lucas Tate
>ltate@primenet.com
>Welverin Do'Urden
>
>"Here we are now, imitate us."
>--Kurt Cobain
Follow-Ups: References: