Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?
From: Eli Allen <eallen@MAIL.BCPL.LIB.MD.US>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:56:50 -0500
Organization: ABSnet Internet Services, Inc. - (410)-685-2000 - info@abs.net
References: <350F057E.AFF7620E@aol.com> <1998031805325000.AAA02682@ladder03.news.aol.com>
Reply-To: Eli Allen <eallen@MAIL.BCPL.LIB.MD.US>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:21740

Except the numbers above 1000 are 5 function calcs <G>

Eli Allen
eallen@bcpl.net


DULCE97 wrote in message
<1998031805325000.AAA02682@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
>Well, thats all good and fine, but I don't really think that the number
makes
>any difference what so ever.  Who cares about the little print on the
front,
>they could name it the ti-1006 for all I care.  If it works, and works well
>thats good enough for me.  I'm sure ti had their reasons when they named
their
>calculators, and if they didn't all the better.
>
>-Dulce

References:

Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?

From: Todd Stanley <toddestan@AOL.COM>

Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?

From: DULCE97 <dulce97@AOL.COM>

Prev: 89
Next: Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread