Re: Numerology

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Numerology
From: "Williams, Matt" <Williams.Matt@CON-WAY.COM>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 08:40:23 -0800
Reply-To: "Williams, Matt" <Williams.Matt@CON-WAY.COM>

I like those theories.

>----------
>From:  rsenzer@PRIMENET.COM[SMTP:rsenzer@PRIMENET.COM]
>Reply To:      rsenzer@PRIMENET.COM
>Sent:  Wednesday, March 18, 1998 12:44 AM
>To:    CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
>Subject:       Numerology
>
>It probably has something to do with the following mathematical relationship,
>86 < 89 < 92.
>
>There are other possibilities such as
>86 + 3 = 89 and 89 + 3 = 92.
>Maybe they consider it halfway between the 86 and the 92.
>
>Maybe they expect the DOW to reach 8900 by the time it is released.
>
>Maybe it's because it has the case of an 8x calculator with the power of a 9x
>calculator.
>
>Maybe it's because if you turn 68000 upside down, you get 00089.
>
>It certainly is confusing.
>
>-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
>