Re: Order of Calculators


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Order of Calculators



Do you mean in development? I would assume the 73. I heard some things about
it before I heard anything about the 89.

At 07:57 PM 3/15/98 -0500, Bryan Rabeler wrote:
>The Pletchers wrote:
>
>> What??
>>
>> At 07:52 PM 3/15/98 -0500, Bryan Rabeler wrote:
>> >Someone at TI:
>> >
>> >Order of graphing calculators:
>> >81, 85, 82, 80, 92, 83, 86, 92+, (73, 89)?
>> >
>> >Does the 73 come before the 89 since the 73 is due out in the summer of
>> >98 and the 89 in the fall of 98?
>> >
>> >--
>> >Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>> >   File Archives
>> >   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>> >
>
>Which came first, the 73 or the 89?
>
>--
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>   File Archives
>   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
__________________________

What is there to say about silence?
__________________________
Welcome to the U.S.S. Crew
-- http://www.jeffb.home.ml.org/
-- http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/1149/
================================================
ICQ UIN (if you have ICQ)        -- 2097846
ICQ E-mail Express (if you dont) -- mailto:2097846@wwp.mirabilis.com
__________________________


Follow-Ups: