Re: Why not the TI-92?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why not the TI-92?
From: rsenzer@PRIMENET.COM
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 17:27:12 GMT
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.980601215542.14751A-100000@table.jps.net> <6l610p$ct5$1@minus.oleane.net>
Reply-To: rsenzer@PRIMENET.COM
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:23288

Can it handle iambic pentameter as well? :)

-----

In article <6l610p$ct5$1@minus.oleane.net>,
  apollet@writeme.com (HPOK) wrote:
>
> Steven Mohr <iwp@TABLE.JPS.NET> wrote:
>
> >buy all of TI's products.....
>
> I own a TI92 and a HP48
> I think HP48 will stay the best calc for a long rime !
>
> DJ Bounce (Aloys POLLET)
> apollet@writeme.com
> http://village.cyberbrain.com/hlm/bounce
>
>


-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading

References:

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: Steven Mohr <iwp@TABLE.JPS.NET>

Re: Why not the TI-92?

From: HPOK <apollet@WRITEME.COM>