Re: an old bug on the 85

Re: an old bug on the 85

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: an old bug on the 85
• From: stephen soltesz <shakere@UTKUX.UTCC.UTK.EDU>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:29:28 -0600
• Organization: University of Tennessee
• References: <34C9152F.CFDE3DB6@utkux.utcc.utk.edu> <34CD4B94.B9B7C9C6@utkux.utcc.utk.edu> <34CD86E7.C0B790B7@cyberg8t.com>
• Reply-To: stephen soltesz <shakere@UTKUX.UTCC.UTK.EDU>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:20239

Geoff Hagopian wrote:
>
> Yeah, this turns out not to be a bug at all, but has to do with Hermitian
> matrices.  The Hermitian is a transpose where each element is also replaced
> with its complex conjugate.
>
> geoffh
>


You're right.. So, even more frustrating is having to admit I don't know
what I'm talking about.:(

so, I guess the guy who wrote the message oh-so long ago about the dot()
problem also didn't know it wasn't a problem..

we should let him know.

Thankyou for explaining this.

stephen.

--
        "I will take my hands and weave them to a little house,
         and there you shall keep a dream--"
                        --Miriamne. "Winterset"

• an old bug on the 85
• From: stephen soltesz <shakere@UTKUX.UTCC.UTK.EDU>
• Re: an old bug on the 85
• From: stephen soltesz <shakere@UTKUX.UTCC.UTK.EDU>
• Re: an old bug on the 85
• From: Geoff Hagopian <galois@cyberg8t.com>

• Prev: Re: TI-82 and PC
• Next: Re: TI-82 and PC
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread