Re: 83 vs. 85/86


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 83 vs. 85/86



>My words were "not in a hurry to..." Read more carefully next time.

They didn't know there was a need or even people who would want to use ASM.
THats the only reason why its in the 83/86.  I bet they never thought
people would be playing 17sec wavs on their calcs...


Follow-Ups: