Re: 83 vs. 85/86
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 83 vs. 85/86
Yet you yourself are sending it to the entire list.
CaptainSp
Adam Berlinsky-Schine wrote:
>
> Meanwhile we're all getting this message which there's no point in us
> seeing. Follow your own advice and only send it to whoever needs to see it.
>
> >I'm geting your msg's twice because you're sending to my address AND
> >calc-ti.
> >
> >CaptainSp
> >
> >Joseph Gaffney wrote:
> >>
> >> At 04:23 PM 1/10/98 -0800, CaptainSp wrote:
> >> >Gee thanks... it's nice to know SOMEONE out there pays attention to the
> >> >fact that TI didn't intend to to give the TI-85 support for ASM.
> >> >
> >> >CaptainSp
> >> >
> >>
> >> *Sigh...* You are ridiculous. Why did you say they would be documenting
> >> it? Utterly preposterous behaviour.....
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> | Joseph M. Gaffney |
> >> | Efnet: rm-rf - gaffney@thethinker.com |
> >> | http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/ |
> >> ----------------------------------------------
>
> ______________________________
> /\ Adam Berlinsky-Schine \
> \ \ President \
> \ \ adam@findcure.com \
> \ \ DIMENSION-TI \
> \ \ http://www.findcure.com/TI/ \
> \ \_____________________________\
> \/_____________________________/
References: