Re: 86 Asm
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 86 Asm
At 03:02 PM 1/10/98 -0700, Klukan wrote:
>Because someone might want to run programs for the 85 or 82 on their
>86.
*Sigh....* I said other.
>Or, they might want a friendlier interface for their programs.
Which is in contradiction with the original post. They just asked if you
needed a shell to run 86 asm programs.
----------------------------------------------
| Joseph M. Gaffney |
| Efnet: rm-rf - gaffney@thethinker.com |
| http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/ |
----------------------------------------------
References:
- Re: 86 Asm
- From: WFD57 <wfd57@AOL.COM>
- Re: 86 Asm
- From: The Pletchers <bpspcp-travelin@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
- Re: 86 Asm
- From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>
- Re: 86 Asm
- From: Klukan <renegade@BMT.NET>