Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?
From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@BIGFOOT.COM>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 22:39:51 -0600
Organization: Expert Internet Services
References: <367312d7.39212419@209.66.79.182> <19981213010247.21585.00005389@ng122.aol.com>
Reply-To: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@BIGFOOT.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26891

Agreed.  The 89 and 92[+] OSs need to be rewriten in asm instead of C++.  That
would greatly
increase speed.

-Miles Raymond

STL137 wrote in message <19981213010247.21585.00005389@ng122.aol.com>...
>85s are very fast, and very efficient, but don't have enough functions. 9x
>calcs are slower, and less efficient, but have PLENTY of functions.
>------
>STL137@aol.com  ===>  Website: http://members.aol.com/stl137/
>PGP keys: ~~~pgp.html Quotes: ~~~quotes.html
>"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of
>tyranny over the mind of man" - Thomas Jefferson

References:

From:

Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

Prev: Re: Is the TI-88 reality or fiction ?
Next: Re: What programs for the Ti-8x woud you like to see?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread