Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?
From: TheLaser <prjohnsonat@UTAHLINXDOT.COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 04:03:01 GMT
Organization: ISPNews http://ispnews.com
References: <367312d7.39212419@209.66.79.182> <19981213010247.21585.00005389@ng122.aol.com>
Reply-To: TheLaser <prjohnsonat@UTAHLINXDOT.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:26886

On 13 Dec 1998 06:02:47 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:

>85s are very fast, and very efficient, but don't have enough functions. 9x
>calcs are slower, and less efficient, but have PLENTY of functions.

I was refering to the speed of the user interface, not the actual
calculation.  My calculator spends more time waiting for me than actually
calculating.
--
TheLaser <prjohnson at utahlinx dot com>

References:

From:

Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>