Re: y1(x) notation

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: y1(x) notation
From: Ray Kremer <rkremer@BRADLEY.EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:04:43 -0400
Reply-To: Ray Kremer <rkremer@BRADLEY.EDU>

I know that the TI-82 has that ability, too, so this must be one of those
things like the TABLE or Text( command that TI first invented when they
made the 82.  I have often wondered if they had this on the 86 as well.
Good job discovering this.  Probably you should download a copy of the 82
manual and see what it says about this.

>I was not aware that one could use functional notation on the TI-86.
>So far I see that using functional notation for y1,y2,... ; r1,r2,...; and
>xt1,yt1,....
>seems to work ok.  The only restriction I have found so far is the arguments of
>these functions used in this way must be real or lists of reals. No complex,
>no vector, and no matrix arguments.
>I have looked through the TI-86 Graphing Calculator Handbook and
>can't find any mention of this.
>I can see many uses of this functionality.
>Does anyone have more information about the use
>of functional notation on the TI-86?

Prev: y1(x) notation
Next: 92i Picture in Fargo II
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread