Re: TI-85 <- Final Answer

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-85 <- Final Answer
From: "Matt H. Rolf" <matthrolf.rpa@JUNO.COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:30:52 -0600
References: <Pine.3.89.9708201821.A18435-0100000@bluestem.prairienet.org>
Reply-To: matthrolf.rpa@JUNO.COM

The answer is on the TI site.  Go to the calculator section and look up
calculator history.  There is your answer.
_______________________________________________
| \  / |   /  \      |        |              Matt H. Rolf
|  \/  |  /__\     |        |              MattHRolf.RPA@JUNO.COM
|      | /      \    |        |

On Thu, 21 Aug 1997 08:34:36 -0500 PHC <paulhc@NETWORKUSA.NET> writes:
>MattC0022 wrote:
>>
>> i dont know if this makes any sense but wouldnt the newest ones have
>a
>> higher number, and arent the higher the number the better, like
>> 80(oldest), 81,82,83(if they make it) 84, (if they make it) ,
>85,86,etc
>> and finally 92(newest)  maybe i am wrong but who really cares
>
>Actually, it is based on the power of the calc.  I think the calc's
>were
>produced in the following order: 80, 81, 85, 82, 83, 92, 86.
>--
>PHC
>paulhc@networkusa.net
>http://members.aol.com/agentphc/
>

References:

From:

Prev: Re: Coversion Error for the TI-85/86?
Next: Re: any program requests?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread