Re: TI-95.

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: TI-95.
From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 11:14:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <19970913090143.AAA31418@bj-rn>
Reply-To: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

At 10:46 AM 9/13/97 +0200, Bear wrote:
>Hi everybody
>Im new to this list but I must say that it is getting exciting!
>I have never heard of the 95 how are it like??
>The only thing I have is a 85 but i have found out it is faster than the
>86
>;)
>
>WebBear

That's not true =P

They both use a 6? mhz zilog cpu.  The only time one is faster than the
other is with basic, which it is silly to use anyway =P


|------------------------------------------------------------|
|         Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com         |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|           "Tiocfaidh Ár Lá" / "Our Day Will Come"          |
|  "If Ignorance Is Bliss Then Knock The Smile Off My Face"  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   The Creative Outlet                      |
|       http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/           |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

Follow-Ups:

The TI-95 was made in 1984, not graphical

From: HPgene <hpgene@AOL.COM>

References:

Re: TI-95.

From: Bear <ryden@POST8.TELE.DK>

Prev: Re: Help needed with csolve function on the 92
Next: Re: TI-86 Catalog
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread