Re: No TI-86. TI-85 or TI-83?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: No TI-86. TI-85 or TI-83?
From: Mike <smofam@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 21:26:26 -0700
Organization: http://mikesworld.home.ml.org
References: <UPMAIL13.199708261904520426@classic.msn.com>
Reply-To: smofam@pacbell.net
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:16299

> I cannot begin to say how much I disagree with major portions of this
> response, primarily because 99% of the motive behind Jeff's choice has
> absolutely nothing to do with the purpose of a calculator.

I personally completely agree with Jeff on his decisions, he has put a
lot of thought in them and has made them incredibly acurate.

  For the rediculously few
> quadratics one is asked to solve in school, this is hardly an issue.

What school do you teach at?  I'm a high school student and I remember
doing many quadradics in my math classes, and am expecting to do more
this year.

-Mike
http://www.geocities.com/~mikesworld
http://pezpage.home.ml.org

References:

From:

Prev: Re: Bug in all 85 and 86
Next: Re: TI-82 programmer at your service.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread