Re: What to buy: CFX-9850G or TI-86?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: What to buy: CFX-9850G or TI-86?
From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 17:32:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <quGZDDANY7Q0EwfK@dawson-eng.demon.co.uk>
References: <344368DA.41C67EA6@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Reply-To: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

At 07:12 PM 10/14/97 +0100, Stuart Dawson wrote:
>the Casio - the programming language smells. TI-basic's not great, but
>it's way ahead of Casio. TI or HP, every time. Also, TI has far better
>customer support - compare the Casio and TI Web sites.

TIBasic isn't great.... but he said the 86, and that has Asm support.

 ----------------------------------------------
|  Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com  |
|          IRC: CuCullin, RmMinusRf            |
|  http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/  |
|       /server irc.pagannet.org 10000         |
 ----------------------------------------------

References:

What to buy: CFX-9850G or TI-86?

From: Frank Ahnert <ahf@HRZ.TU-CHEMNITZ.DE>

Re: What to buy: CFX-9850G or TI-86?

From: Stuart Dawson <sd@DAWSON-ENG.DEMON.CO.UK>

Prev: woah..
Next: Re: whoa? fake Batteries are low stuff? uh hm... (TI-86)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread