Re: hehehe really sad..
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: hehehe really sad..
I disagree. the website clearly has says "here's how to subscribe, here's
how to unsubscribe, don't send messages to group trying to unsubscribe".
in order to even subscribe you need to read that message. then to top it
off, they send a message saying it all over again.
you have to be moron to block all that stuff out. then you have to go
through the trouble of sending a message to the group. how do they know
what message to send? they read it off the website, right next the the
messages saying where to send said message.
there's no excuse.
on other hand, no need to flame first offence. simple message saying "go
to the www site" would do it. but I too have had that frustration, and
shouted!
Jesse1s (at) hotmail (dot) com
In article
<Pine.OSF.3.95.971011223550.27114B-100000@raider.grcc.cc.mi.us>, "R. De
Young" <rdeyoung@RAIDER.GRCC.CC.MI.US> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Man, I've seen some smack talk garbage come out of AOL....
>
> Its pretty surprising how much trouble can come out of a misread mail
> header. My apologies. It was hastily read, and hastily written.
>
> I suppose I can relate with N X T's origianl comment about the
> frustrations of having to deal with people with no desire to 'RTFM' (or
> more apporpriately--RTFWS--Read the %$^@%$# Web Site). However, from
> having to deal with the 'hacker mentality' on IRC and other such places, I
> can tell you that such comments are only productive when they aren't made
> as an insult to one's intelligence. I think if a person had a genuine
> interest in pointing someone in the right direction, he wouldn't make his
> suggestion into an attempt to make himself look good through a mass mail
> or newsgroup posting laden with insults.
References: