Re: TI or HP?/games-or-power
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI or HP?/games-or-power
>>True, most computers are bought for applications.
>>HOWEVER, computers evolve for games. No one would buy a new
>>PII 300 for Word 8.0, they buy it to have the power that modern games
>>demand.
>
>So you're saying that I would have no problem running WIN95, with
>OFFICE 97, a load of network stuff, along with my email and planner
>software, PLUS my copy of quicken on my Tandy 1000? I think NOT!!
>Things like 3D cards evolve for games, but 85% of hardware is not
>evolving for games.
>-calc 82 <c82@juno.com>
>For Sale:MINT TI-82, with PC link, MINT manual, ADULT owned, sell or
>trade for HP
>
Exactly! Sort of. What I meant was that the more rapid evolution of
computers, while allows for more Refined applications & Powerful games,
the real benefactor is more the games than applications.
If you had a 386-25SX running Windows 3.x, Word 2.0, Quicken,
network & email stuff, but not all at the same time, your output would
not be much, if at all, lower in quality. Mainly because a limit exists
for applications, that there can be only so much usefulness. ie. Word 6
was the last major "must have." The other versions aren't worth blowing
hundreds of dollars for, unless you have extra cash lying around.
On the other hand, however, the quality of games on a 386 was
much less than on a PII 300. ie. World Circuit vs. Grand Prix II (W.C.
2).
-Larry Currie
Larry1492@Juno.Com
"How does the Clapper(tm) distinguish between a clap and applause?"
Follow-Ups:
References: