Re: OS-82 vs. ASH

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: OS-82 vs. ASH
From: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@TIR.COM>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 01:49:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <19971009.224727.5375.4.Larry1492@juno.com>
References: <l03110700b05ef0c97918@[10.1.10.196]>
Reply-To: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@TIR.COM>

At 11:06 PM 10/9/97 EDT, you wrote:
>I ONLY use ASH 3.0 on my 82 R.V. 19.0 and never had a crash.
>OShell is more like OS-Hell for the Q var thing.  Too many of my basic
>games use Q.
>Of course, if u use matrices a lot, you could say the same of ASH 3.0.
>But, ASH seems the better choice.  (Especially w/ the only '82 ASM
>tetris).
>
>-Larry Currie
>Larry1492@Juno.com
>Noted Author of Whack-A-Mole 2.7

Actually, no TI-BASIC program can use matrices L1 and L2.  So, ASH doesn't
interfere with any part of volatile memory.  Besides, OS-82 "replaced"
OShell-82 a long time ago (I still support it because I used to like its
interface better).


                 Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"
         http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
                    http://shinelight.home.ml.org

References:

OS-82 vs. ASH

From: David Endahl <endahld@SCNC.WMSTON.K12.MI.US>

Re: OS-82 vs. ASH

From: Larry G Currie <larry1492@JUNO.COM>

Prev: Re: Parallel 86 backup?
Next: Re: mac cable
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread