Re: Ti-92 ver 1.11 new at Office Depot, too old ver? Help!

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Ti-92 ver 1.11 new at Office Depot, too old ver? Help!
From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 12:02:37 -0500
Comments: To: Daniel Reed <djr@NARNIA.N.ML.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.971101112311.8984L-100000@narnia.n.ml.org>
References: <345AA7A4.BDB6E453@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Reply-To: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

At 11:34 AM 11/1/97 -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
>Er, then you're telling me that the Linux kernel version 2.0.4 is newer
>than version 2.0.31? Here's a hint: 2.0.4 was released July 8th 1996, and
>.31 was released just a couple weeks ago (October 17th 1997).

Oh youre a quickie aren't you? =P

Bryan said:

A) With _TI_
B) In his opinion they would set it up in a normal fashion (ie: 1.10 = 1
and 10/1000, 1.11 = 1 11/1000, etc)

 ----------------------------------------------
|  Joseph M. Gaffney - gaffney@thethinker.com  |
|          IRC: CuCullin, RmMinusRf            |
|  http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/  |
|       /server irc.pagannet.org 10000         |
 ----------------------------------------------

References:

Re: Ti-92 ver 1.11 new at Office Depot, too old ver? Help!

From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ISD.INGHAM.K12.MI.US>

Re: Ti-92 ver 1.11 new at Office Depot, too old ver? Help!

From: Daniel Reed <djr@NARNIA.N.ML.ORG>

Prev: Re: Should I exchange my TI-82 for a TI-85?
Next: Re: Which TI should I buy?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread