Re: Second-rate 86 programmers
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Second-rate 86 programmers
What? Y'all are comparing too very unlike machines. The TI-86 has been,
what, a month or two? Assembler info came out 2 weeks or so ago.... And
hmmm, the TI-85 has been out 5 YEARS at least... and assembly has been
available for quite a few of those years.
Please think logically before comparing things that don't make sense to
compare.
Richard
BowmanSoft Software
http://www.bowmansoft.com/
Web Hosting and Design Services
-----Original Message-----
From: Garcia <xrigel@Q-NET.NET>
To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM <CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM>
Date: Sunday, July 20, 1997 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: Second-rate 86 programmers
>At least they are written.
>
>----------
>> From: James D. Yopp <YOPP_J@POPMAIL.FIRN.EDU>
>> To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
>> Subject: Re: Second-rate 86 programmers
>> Date: Sunday, July 20, 1997 7:40 PM
>>
>> > As for 86 games, well, I'd say that almost everybody that wants
>> > program calcs and is very good at it has already bought a ti-85 or 92.
>>
>> I'm offended by that remark (as are some others, undoubtedly...). I
>haven't
>> released any games yet, but I plan to, and if you'd like to see some poor
>> programming, just sift through the ASM source libraries on ticalc.org.
>Many of
>> the most popular games are written VERY poorly.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> James D. Yopp, Jr.
>> jyopp@pobox.com
>> "Time is the fire in which we burn."
>