Re: Graphics, TI vs. HP

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Graphics, TI vs. HP
From: Todd Stanley <toddestan@AOL.COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:47:31 -0500
Organization: SCI
References: <3.0.32.19970710160955.0069a7cc@msw0.attnet.or.jp> <33C5AF1D.511C3163@capitol-college.edu> <5q9lt1$eu2$8@uuneo.neosoft.com>
Reply-To: Todd Stanley <toddestan@AOL.COM>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:15264

barrym wrote:
>
> Rigor Mortis (ksmith@CAPITOL-COLLEGE.EDU) wrote:
> : even better than the 85. i forget what the screen resolution is exactly,
> : bit it has more pixels horizontally than the 85, but the same number
> : vertically.
> : -mortis
>
> The 48 resolution is 131x64 pixels.  I forget what the 85 is but I
> thought it was similar.  I know the 83 has lower resolution.
>
> Barry

85: 128x64
82&83: 96x64 (I think...)

Todd

References:

Graphics, TI vs. HP

From: Bishop <ldgregory@BIOGATE.COM>

Re: Graphics, TI vs. HP

From: Rigor Mortis <ksmith@CAPITOL-COLLEGE.EDU>

Re: Graphics, TI vs. HP

From: barrym <barrym@NEOSOFT.COM>

Prev: TI-86 Assembly programming
Next: How to get those bloody programs to your Calc.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread