Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing

Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing
• From: Chad Palmer <calsoftinc@GEOCITIES.COM>
• Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 12:26:06 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970716114234.007ada40@www.thethinker.com>
• Reply-To: Chad Palmer <calsoftinc@GEOCITIES.COM>

I agree fully, and I might add since Bryan Rabeler neglected to that Bill
Nagel offered to remove it from the readme when he started complaining.

Chad Palmer


At 11:42 AM 7/16/97 -0400, Joesph Gaffney  wrote:
>Sorry Allah, but I would have to DISagree (sorry for the absence of three
>letters last time, I'm an idiot =) )with you.  In the documentation of a
>game, an author basically is able to give his opinion about many things,
>and how he wants his program to be known.  The fact is, you do use his
>software often, after all, can you name one ASM game for the 86 that wasn't
>written by Bill?  If you don't like his opinion, don't use his software.
>
>

• Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing
• From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>

• Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing
• From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>

• Prev: Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing
• Next: Re: TI-86 Penguins Text File - Rather Disturbing
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread