Re: serious ASH bug!!!

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: serious ASH bug!!!
From: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@TIR.COM>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 17:15:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <33B7B7A4.FA252012@novanet.net.au>
References: <3.0.1.16.19970629192641.33afbc7a@mail.tir.com>
Reply-To: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@TIR.COM>

At 11:41 PM 6/30/97 +1000, you wrote:
>What version are you using?  I've disected the code of v2 and it seems
>fine.  IMHO the code for ASH is a lot neater than that of OShell.

I'm using v2.0.  I agree that ASH is nicer (and has a better interface),
but you have to admit that a shell is one of the hardest things to write.
Some people just don't have that kind of time on their hands to write good
shells.  However, OShell-82 seems like a pretty good programming interface
to write code for (it has the advantage of titles instead of file names).

Signed,
Thomas J. Hruska

|----------------------------------------------------|
|             Shining Light Productions              |
|      "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"     |
|                                                    |
|   C/C++ programs                                   |
|   QBasic programs                                  |
|   JavaScript                                       |
|   TI-Basic                                         |
|   HTML                                             |
|                                                    |
| Search for our web site at                         |
| www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504/      |
|                                                    |
| We use a dynamic web server for most of our        |
| documents!!!                                       |
| Soon to go to a full JavaScript 1.1 web site!      |
|----------------------------------------------------|

Follow-Ups:

Re: serious ASH bug!!!

From: "The Bendzick's" <bendzick@MILLCOMM.COM>

References:

From:

From: