Re: Doom Or Duke Nukem

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Doom Or Duke Nukem
From: Jimmy Merdell <mja@algonet.se>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 23:56:23 GMT
Organization: Algonet/Tninet
References: <33FA31CA.6DB9875E@apex.net> <NOSPAMkirkm2506-ya02408000R1908972015420001@news.earthlink.net> <19970820.180645.4407.3.nxt@juno.com>
Reply-To: mja@algonet.se
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:15982

On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 21:06:38 EDT, n X t <nxt@JUNO.COM> wrote:

>there are DOOM games for the TI85 tibasic and zshell.. but there is none
>for the 82. the ti82 is OBSOLETE...and no one will make one for an 82..
>there's no point.. the doom for the 85.. both basic and zshell both SUCK.

Ehh... Daedulus sux!? It's like the most impressive game for ZShell...
sure, it's a bit too slow to be playable, but 7 frames per second on
a raycasting engine in grayscale on a Z80 _does_ count for something.

Jimmy Merdell <mja@algonet.se>
http://www.algonet.se/~mja
IRC: Yarin

References:

Doom Or Duke Nukem

From: Hunter <hunterm@APEX.NET>

Re: Doom Or Duke Nukem

From: Kirk Mueller <NOSPAMkirkm2506@EARTHLINK.NET>

Re: Doom Or Duke Nukem

From: n X t <nxt@JUNO.COM>

Prev: Good book for TI-92 Programming ?
Next: Re: Conversion Error
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread