Re: Hal

Re: Hal

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Hal
• From: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@TIR.COM>
• Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 11:11:13 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970801074532.007c85e0@mail.iepsnet.com>
• References: <MAPI.Id.0016.007268616c6c20203030303630303036@MAPI.to.RFC8 22> <3.0.1.32.19970801065942.007d1e50@mail.iepsnet.com> <3.0.1.32.19970801065942.007d1e50@mail.iepsnet.com> <3.0.1.32.19970801065942.007d1e50@mail.iepsnet.com>
• Reply-To: "Thomas J. Hruska" <thruska@TIR.COM>

At 07:45 AM 8/1/97 -0700, you wrote:
>I don't care about Ash, z-Shell, o-Shell, or any of those other shells
>either.  Besides, the only thing that shells have brought us are even more
>games, and more e-mail cluttering up the lists.

However, games ARE the point of shells.  This allows us to have more fun in
class and get you teachers real ticked off.

• Re: Hal
• From: Andrew Rintoul <rintoul@EMAIL.UNC.EDU>

• From:
• Hal
• From: Bernard Domroy <bdomroy@IEPSNET.COM>
• Re: Hal
• From: Bernard Domroy <bdomroy@IEPSNET.COM>

• Prev: CBL-calculator protocol
• Next: Re: Hal
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread