Re: TI-92 ROM Versions

Subject: Re: TI-92 ROM Versions
From: Jim Pingle <Tajador@cris.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 01:03:06 GMT
In-Reply-To: <Pine.PMDF.3.91.961003182439.101170A-100000@TITAN.SFASU.EDU>

On Thu, 3 Oct 1996 18:27:47 -0600, you wrote:


>I would really like to know the spsific serial number to look for.  I
>have one on layway and need to kon if I am getting 1.7 or lower...
>I am bollowing my teachers verson and would kindof like to know the
>differences in the virsions...
>hehe..my teacher has the betta 1.0b1 version, what improvements wold I
>expect in a 1.7?
>thanks.
[snip]
>Thanks, but I would more spificly like the number in the back of the
>ti-92, and while I'm at it, the ti-85 as well.  Until Fargo comes out, I
>do not want to bother with a generic 68k assembler.  The on on the back
>of my calc is V0101836  i-0995 ant its 1.0b1 version.  Its just that =
they
>wuld have the same prof of purchace on an older version than a new one.


I have Version a TI-92 ROM v1.12 dated 05/08/96, # on the back of the
92 is V1113843 I-0696  and the bar code is 0 33317 17200 9... FYI it
was in the sealed plastic package. Also I have 2 TI-85s, 1 is ROM v1.0
numbered 0986323 I-0992, and the other is ROM v9.0 numbered
17021102cbl I-0594E. From the looks of it the I-nnnn is the mo/yr it
was made, not sure though, just a guess. hope this helps.
-Jim Pingle- (Tajador on IRC)
Tajador@cris.com  *  Tajador@juno.com * pingjj01@holmes.ipfw.indiana.edu
http://www.cris.com/~Tajador  =20
=20

References:

From: