Re: Real OS for 82,83,85, and 92...

Subject: Re: Real OS for 82,83,85, and 92...
From: Scott Yellig <syellig@phish.nether.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:47:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <19961109215900.QAA22396@ladder01.news.aol.com>

oh, lets see why wont this work:

Big one... the 82 cant do assembly(well, theres talk of a bug that looks
really promising, but nothing tot the point you could have written
anything yet :), and if you're doing this in script, its hardly a kernel
(its kern_E_l not _A_l just so you know in the future)

And, besides just the assembly thing, the calcs differ so much, i have a
very hard time seeing how a 'real OS' could work on both of them.

However, if by some magic you have done this, i would love to be proven
wrong. So post a place to get the demo, if it exists.

On Sat, 9 Nov 1996 calfolds@AOL.COM wrote:

>    I'v written a kernal for a OS on the 82.  I have made sure that it will
> be able to be a crossplatform for the 85 and I'm sure it will work on the
> other 2 as well.   the way I have done this is by storing the programs in
> a matric and the kernal then reads the program from that.  As of now it is
> perty slow although I have a plan to increase the speed by a factor of 8.
> Right now all I have writen is a buggy kernal and I need help finding the
> bugs.  I'm looking for one person to help me with this.  I am planing on
> realeasing the prog as a Free Demo and then a final ver will become
> availible for $5.00.  My second programer will get 1/3 of what ever the OS
> makes.  If you are interested please send me a E-mail.
>                                                     Thank You.
>                                                           ,Cal
>
>

References:

From: