Re: TI-92
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Yeah, but what about the memory cards (up to 1 MB, and probably more
reliable) for the HP that have already been available for a few years?
----------
| From: Zenon Lynx <Zenon@BBS.NEXES.COM>
| To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
| Subject: Re: TI-92
| Date: Saturday, November 02, 1996 10:37 PM
|
| Yeah, well, you don't have to worry about the memory problem anymore!
| There's a RAM extender being created by Mel Tsai and it's going to give
you
| anywhere from 512KB to 4MBs extra for your calc! HAHA! It's for the
| TI-83, the TI-85 and the TI-92! Sorry, no TI-81s or 82s, and DEFINITELY
| not for HPs or CASIOS!! Haha! And it's only going to cost like $60 max
| for 1MB, probably only up to $100 for 4MBs or something! NO FAKE NON
TIs!!
|
| "This is the most logical route, Captain"
| -= Zenon@bbs.nexes.com =-
|
| ----------
| : From: tram@HUMBOLDT1.COM
| : To: Zenon
| : Subject: Re: TI-92
| : Date: November 1, 1996 9:57 PM
| :
| :
| : On Fri, 01 Nov 1996 00:00:29 -0500, William Chen <wchen@tir.com>
| : wrote:
| :
| : >To anyone with a TI-92:
| : >
| : > Do you think that the TI-92 was worth the $200 you paid for it
| and what
| : >is better about Fargo and the TI-92 compared to Zshell and the TI-85?
I
| : >currently have a TI-85 with Zshell, and I think it is great. I'm
| : >wondering if a TI-92 would be worth spending the $200 since I'm going
to
| : >major in Engineering next year. Thanks in advance for any replies.
| :
| : I think the 92 was well worth the $179 I spent for it. The only
| : problem is that on really big stuff, it can run out of memory. Also,
| : my older ROM version (1.3) sometimes leaves in odd ways of expressing
| : 1 in integrals, such as ln(e). My classmates with newer roms (ver.
| : >10) don't seem to have this problem.
| : I am a student majoring in engineering, and I love the 92. About
| : twice a month a HP 48 owner comes into class sporting thier new 92.
| : They are the best, IMHO, and well worth the money. One of those, a
| : graphlink for your computer, and your set.
References: