Re: your mail

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: your mail
From: hummer <hummer@BELLSOUTH.NET>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 21:41:10 -0000
Reply-To: hummer <hummer@BELLSOUTH.NET>

you could take the limit, but it won't make any difference in proving his "theorum"

you should take the limit of x/x as x approaches zero.

Bhuvanesh Bhatt.

On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Severin wrote:

> Thank you very much for you help, but the books comes befor the
> calculation. therefore it's wrong since your div by 0
>
>
>
>
>
> Hey all!  I can prove 1=2  (or anything, for that matter)
>
> Okay, 0=0, correct?
> therefore                               0=0+0
> div all by 0                    0/0=0/0+0/0
> any # over itself=1, therefore:         1=1+1
>                                 1=2
> Of course, this is exactly why all the algebra books say a/b=1 of a=b and
> b<>0.
>
> ttyl
>     ___     _____
>    /      \    /               /\       /          Klien Bottle for rent;
> inquire within.
>   /___/   /____     /  \     /           Smoke a cigarette.  Slit your
> throat.  Same concept.
>  /       \   /              /    \   /             Nothing but Net!
> /____/ /_____  /       \/              benkc@juno.com
>