Re: What the heck?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: What the heck?
From: ANTIRUSH <antirush@CRIS.COM>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:15:09 GMT
Organization: mikescinto@aol.com is a turd polisher..
References: <32a650a3.10940556@news.concentric.net> <19961203020700.VAA27737@ladder01.news.aol.com> <32ada8f3.99097964@news.concentric.net> <32ab230f.306636098@newsreader.wustl.edu>
Reply-To: ANTIRUSH <antirush@CRIS.COM>

On Sun, 08 Dec 1996 20:20:50 GMT, mao@wuchem.wustl.edu (Dean Mao)
wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Dec 1996 04:14:05 GMT, antirush@cris.com (ANTIRUSH) wrote:
>
>>On 3 Dec 1996 02:06:03 GMT, damienden@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Oh, and points for antirush (the*guy*without*a*real*address); I agree: The
>>>responses to the post didn't have to be at all graphic or explicit,
>>>especially with the point you're trying to get across.
>>
>>I have a *real* email address, try and see...
>
>no you don't.  you have an AOL account.

Uh, I do *(_#  NOT   #_)* have an AOL account....

read this VERY CLOSELY...

References:

Re: What the hell?

From: A#N#T#I#R#U#S#H <th@T.WOULD.BE.NICE>

Re: What the heck?

From: damienden@AOL.COM

Re: What the heck?

From: ANTIRUSH <antirush@CRIS.COM>

Re: What the heck?

From: Dean Mao <mao@wuchem.wustl.edu>

Prev: No Subject
Next: unsubscribe
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread