Re: Why are TI Calcs so inferior?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why are TI Calcs so inferior?
From: Martin Knowles <mknowles@halcyon.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:02:03 -0800
Organization: Lightning Systems
References: <AmXC08y00YUs0RnFU0@andrew.cmu.edu> <QmXYAN200bkX0ZKo40@andrew.cmu.edu> <577604$r94@dismay.ucs.indiana.edu> <DX2ly4S9c+RC089yn@netcom.com> <57sr6u$qd@dismay.ucs.indiana.edu>
Reply-To: mknowles@halcyon.com

Scott Goehring wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> In article <DX2ly4S9c+RC089yn@netcom.com>,
> Dave Shuman <dshuman@netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >Speaking as a potential patient, I rather trust the doctor that
> >used the calc.  The performance of the human mind is far too
> >variable, especially under stress!
>
> one of the selection criteria for doctors is the ability to perform
> reliably under stress.  you don't make it through med school if you
> can't.

Perhaps we should start a couple of new listserv's:

 CALC-ADVOCACY-TI
and
 CALC-ADVOCACY-HP

so that those who want to do the calculator equivalent of platform wars
can do so and leave calc-ti for the rest of us.

--
~~ Martin Knowles - Lightning Systems
~~ mknowles@halcyon.com
~~ Software, Hardware, Publishing/Fonts, Multimedia Design
~~ Consulting and Training

References:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Re: Why are TI Calcs so inferior?

From: Scott Goehring <scott@POVERTY.BLOOMINGTON.IN.US>

Prev: Re: A little help with a PHYSICS program
Next: Re: What the heck?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread