Re: HP48 vs TI-92
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
>Many people in this thread have commented on a ML solution to a problem
>with the HP's speed in doing stuff, but when (if?) Fargo comes out, why
>not do the same for that Matrix thing which was also mentioned? If
>someone could develop a faster and/or more accurate way of doing
>certain things through Fargo, then by all means, make a separate math
>utility to do so! Better yet, anything which the TI-92 can't do, let
>Fargo take over!
I'm an HP48gx user... and I'm a Ti-82 user. I love both calculators
very much. They both have their pros and cons.
But for someone to make a ML solution to mathematics on a TI-92 seems
unreal. First of all, how many software engineers use the Ti-92?
Second, how many of those software engineers are math majors? Since
the Ti-92 is aimed mainly at education, engineers don't really
consider buying one of those. HP aims at engineers which accounts for
the ML software available on the 'net.
I do know a bit of 68k assembly, but I'm not sure how much of it is
compatible with the Ti calculator. Graphic routines may be
different....
___ __ __
| "You can pick your friends, and | ( \ ( \/ ) mao@wuchem.wustl.edu |
| you can pick your nose; but you | ) ) ) ) ( |
| can't pick your friend's nose." | (___/ (_/\/\_) (Dean Mao) |
'--------------------------------------------------------------------------'
References: