Re: END THIS THREAD!!!! (was: Re: TI sucks HP rules)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
I agree... the only good way to discuss the relative merits of the calcs is
in a MATURE manner... insults just detract from the point and clutter the
group...
The HP-48 uses a 4MHz Saturn processor, BTW...
At 20:55 7/31/96 +0700, you wrote:
>At 07:14 PM 7/31/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 31 Jul 1996, Eric P. Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> >In <4r30an$bnn@uuneo.neosoft.com>, barrym@starbase.neosoft.com (barrym)
>writes:
>>> >>Muhammad A. Khan (makhan@firefly.prairienet.org) wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Who really cares? These calc wars are getting old. We all know who will
>>> win all of them on a TI mailing list, so let's just give it up. If you like
>>> your TI, GREAT! If you like your HP, GREAT! Can't we all just get along?
>>
>>
>>I think we're getting along ok. Comparing the TI and the HP is
>>a valid and useful thing to do if it's done in an adult way.
>>They're different and someone asked about the difference and
>>since I own several of both now, I told him what I think.
>
>
>I agree that comparing is ok, but the pointless flames that get into the
>equation is what annoys me. The original poster who started this "TI sucks
>HP rules" thread was just a spammer who wanted to insult TI users in this
>newsgroup. Unfortunately, that person probably doesn't care if anyone
>replies to him with a valid argument, and most likely doesn't even read
>anything here.
>
>>I don't think you can read any wars into my comments. I pointed
>>out what I think are the advantages of both and I pointed out that
>>certain people (probably most people) will prefer the TI but the
>>people who like to dig and customize will prefer the HP. No war
>>material there. Just honest opinion when someone wanted to know
>>the difference.
>
>I was not referring to your comments. It seemed that you were one of the
>only people posting to the thread with maturity. What irks me are these HP
>people who come and just start some garbage. I'm sure some TI people do it
>too. They don't discuss or compare anything. Instead they simply want to
>insult people. I don't feel that is appropriate here, IMHO. Other than
>your posts and the posts of a few others, most of the posts of this nature
>have had no point whatsoever of any consequence to make.
>
>>I have both and I intend to use both, but not for the same things.
>>I also intend to enjoy both and discussing them is part of enjoying
>>them to me.
>
>I agree wholeheartedly with discussing and comparing the two. I just wish
>that it could be done in a civilized manner.
>
>Since you have an HP, what speed is the processor in the HP-48? I have
>heard people complain that it is a Saturn processor that is too slow.
>
>cya
>
>
>
>
>************************************************************
>* Eric P. Anderson "Who is General *
>* crusader@mo.net Failure and why *
>* http://walden.mo.net/~crusader/ is he reading *
>* Finger for PGP public key. drive C?" *
>* Fprint:3E 3C 52 A2 C1 3F 61 B5 71 7F 10 F1 09 B4 D4 D7 *
>* This is a public notice that all unsolicited and/or *
>* commercial emailers will be charged an archival and *
>* downloading fee of U.S. $500. Emailing me signifies *
>* agreement to these terms. *
>* "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Jefferson *
>************************************************************
>
>
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Peter Kolbus +1.810.474.0872 |
| ae607@detroit.freenet.org #include <disclaimer.h> |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| "640K should be enough for anybody" |
| -Bill Gates, 1986 |
| |
| Who is General Failure, and why is he reading drive C? |
| |
| ***Written using 100% recycled electrons*** |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
References: