Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer

Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer

• To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Aaron Hill" <serac@lightmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:23:59 -0800
• References: <000801bf5fae$a0d62440$3200a8c0@ftcpb002><001401bf5fbd$172c4c60$0500000a@junon><000701bf5fd3$b2c8b760$8dd7dacf@oemcomputer><000f01bf5fc3$d31826a0$0500000a@junon><001801bf5fe0$119120a0$3200a8c0@ftcpb002> <4.2.0.58.20000116144745.01d02170@localhost>
• Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org

> Because it's not a 68000.
> TI's using a somewhat modified embedded 68K chip (at least in my 
> calc).  It's not a 68010/20/30/40, but it's not a straight 68000, either.

I thought that was a rumor--that the chip was not a Motorola 68000 but
some cheap copy.  Mine has a Motorola logo on it, so I'd trust it was
a REAL Motorola chip.  I'd just assume it was a pure 68000.  But hey,
as long as we are able to program for it, I doubt it truly matters.

• Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net>

• A92: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Sean Barnes" <sean.a.barnes@att.net>
• A92: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Aaron Hill" <serac@lightmail.com>
• A92: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Andrew Magness" <AndrewM@ev1.net>
• A92: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Aaron Hill" <serac@lightmail.com>
• A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Sean Barnes" <sean.a.barnes@att.net>
• Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• From: "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net>

• Prev: Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• Next: Re: A92: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd comment by P. Fischer
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread