Re: A92: Shells and assembler

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A92: Shells and assembler
From: Betelg@aol.com
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 21:30:51 EDT
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


Really.  so (I haven't programmed with Fargo) Fargo doesn't mess with the 
keyboard input and such like some of the 83 & 85 shells do?

> >Oh, right you are then!  That's a bit silly isn't it? considering that the
>  >two operating systems' assemblers are different.  Are there 89's on this 
> list
>  >too? is this list just M68k?
>  
>  The assemblers aren't different.  They're both A68K.
>  And yes, there -are- 89's on this list, since generally compiling for one 
>  or the other is just a DEFINE in the source.
>  The system architecture is absolutely identical, the difference lies in 
the 
>  OS and the amount of RAM.  It's possible to simultaneously develop a 
>  program for both the 92 and the 92+.  I see no reason why the lists should 
>  be differentiated.

Prev: Re: A92: Re: Shells and assembler
Next: Re: A92: Re: Shells and assembler
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread